Raost

Start a new topic for a new roast profile. Reply to an existing topic to enter your comments on the profile, or to attach minor variants.
Beanthere
Posts: 3
Joined: Fri 17 Feb, 2023 3:45 pm
x 1

Re: Raost

#3271

Post by Beanthere »

(see above, duplicate post)
Virterm
Posts: 24
Joined: Tue 05 Dec, 2023 11:48 am
Location: Ottawa, Canada
x 1

Re: Raost

#3272

Post by Virterm »

Yes
discoaus
Posts: 35
Joined: Wed 27 Apr, 2022 4:18 pm
x 3

Re: Raost

#3284

Post by discoaus »

Virterm wrote: Mon 01 Jan, 2024 8:18 am So essentially, the boost uses the ‘recommended load size’ as its reference point. It doesn’t have 120g hardcoded; it’s just that the default value for the recommended load size happens to be 120g. Am I understanding this correctly? Sorry, it’s straightforward yet confusing at the same time.
So prior to the boost kit, all user created profiles, and stock standard profiles ran off the basis of 100-120g as the default load size. Generally you couldn’t load anymore than 120g in, then the boost kit was released. The software within this technically multiplied the values of the current profile to whatever load size you choose before roasting. So it’s hard to tell whether the profile was set for 100g or 120g, but as long as you set your load size correctly, it should work accordingly. You may have to do some of your own testing though to make sure, as the user created may not follow this perfectly, as some of the profiles were designed for 80g batches, and some for 100g etc. goodluck
Post Reply